ChatterBank0 min ago
Atheist Confusion?
174 Answers
Its about time the AB atheists had a big fat believer to sink their teeth into, and tear to shreds, all red in tooth and claw.
Like fox hunting, it is an acceptable blood sport :-)
So, Richard Dawkins has stated that the universe is simply blind indifference, (paraphrased), that we simply dance to the demands of our DNA.
Yet he has said that science has put men on the moon, yet evil religion flies planes into towers.
Do you see the inconsistency?
This raises questions about morality, and maybe, just maybe, we could discuss it without spilling too much blood, burning too many martyrs, or sending hate mail?
(But just in case I shall be wearing full body armour and a crash helmet :-)
Like fox hunting, it is an acceptable blood sport :-)
So, Richard Dawkins has stated that the universe is simply blind indifference, (paraphrased), that we simply dance to the demands of our DNA.
Yet he has said that science has put men on the moon, yet evil religion flies planes into towers.
Do you see the inconsistency?
This raises questions about morality, and maybe, just maybe, we could discuss it without spilling too much blood, burning too many martyrs, or sending hate mail?
(But just in case I shall be wearing full body armour and a crash helmet :-)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Theland to Vulcan, //Are you seriously seeking God//
You've made reference to 'seeking God' several times over several threads. Why? It is, in your opinion, imperative that questioners on a chat board such as this should be seeking God? You claim to attempt to answer questions but you don't - unless it suits you.
You've made reference to 'seeking God' several times over several threads. Why? It is, in your opinion, imperative that questioners on a chat board such as this should be seeking God? You claim to attempt to answer questions but you don't - unless it suits you.
// Richard Dawkins has stated that the universe is simply blind indifference, (paraphrased), //
if you conclude that, then you should read him again - he doesnt say that
the universe ( after the first billionth of asecond) has a relatively ( ha yes general relativity!) straightforward set of equations. ( Bar 90% of the universe is dark matter and little things like that)
and Darwins theory of evolution is certainly NOT blind indifference. I wd seriously suggest that someone shd fail Biology O level if they came out with that. (in fact at O and A level you cant fail even with only one very very bad mistake - there has to be kinda constant hail of them)
if you conclude that, then you should read him again - he doesnt say that
the universe ( after the first billionth of asecond) has a relatively ( ha yes general relativity!) straightforward set of equations. ( Bar 90% of the universe is dark matter and little things like that)
and Darwins theory of evolution is certainly NOT blind indifference. I wd seriously suggest that someone shd fail Biology O level if they came out with that. (in fact at O and A level you cant fail even with only one very very bad mistake - there has to be kinda constant hail of them)