@goodlife I think you are spectacularly missing the point.
It is a simple matter for you to offer a summary of a parable or piece of biblical screed with which you wish to illustrate a point, together with a link to the original source.
This has the benefit of reducing the amount of text on screen. It allows for people to read the parable in its original setting, so they get a sense of the beliefs or biases that might be motivating the post, and it affords attribution to the original author, anonymous or not.
To do otherwise, to do as you do, is dishonest. It is lazy. In case you are unaware, these are not virtues. For those of us who have experience of your posts, we are aware now of what you do. For others, new to the site, or just browsing the internet, they may actually believe that the eloquence is yours, that the thought behind the article is original, and yours, and when in forums like this, it protects you from defending your posts with words of your own.
As it stands, it is just drive-by propaganda - relentless proselytising representing little or no effort or thought on your part - churnalism, online preaching. Its distasteful, dishonest, and lazy. Have I already said that?
On those rare occasions when you condescend to grace us with words of your own, we can see why you prefer to shelter behind the anonymous essays of watchtower :)
This is principally a discussion forum - not a platform for you to preach from. That means we discuss and debate and argue about postings, and that means you should have the courage of your convictions and use your own words and thoughts.