andy-hughes you said, "When women are together, no veils are worn, if a man wishes to enter the classroom a bell is rung, and the ladies put on their veils - simple system, everyone is happy. That is cultural acceptance at work. " I have to object to the statement, "everyone is happy", how are you so sure in that belief? As a woman who has lived in the north of the UK for many years, in South East Asia for many years and now in London I can see that the niqab has actually become more prevalent in recent years, thirty years ago I never saw a niqab being worn in Oldham or Rochdale and now I can see them any day in West London. Here are some of Alibaih- Browns objections: Here is a list of my main objections:
1. While modesty is required of Muslim men and women and men are asked to "lower their gazes", there is no injunction to hide the hair, and the verses on coverings have different interpretations. The Prophet's wives were veiled to stop harassers and supplicants. Saudis use big money to push their fanatically anti-woman Islam in this country. Each niqab is one more win in that assault on hearts and minds.
2. Iranian, Afghan, Saudi and other Muslim women are beaten and tortured for the smallest sartorial transgression. European Muslims donning the niqab are giving succour to the oppressors in those countries.
3. They say it stops molestation and is a mark of respect. Oh yeah? So tell me why there are appalling levels of rape and violence in Muslim lands. And by implication do we, European women who don't cover, therefore deserve molestation?
4. It is a form of female apartheid, of selected segregation tacitly saying non-veiled women are pollutants. There is such a thing as society and we connect with our faces. A veiled female withholds herself from that contact and reads our faces, thus gaining power over the rest of us.
Please read her articlein the Independent:
17:45 Mon 11th Apr 2011