Crosswords1 min ago
Is The Edl's Tommy Robinson Sill On Bail?
Anyone know?
He was arrested again yesterday headed for the London mosque.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-londo n-23110 566
He was arrested again yesterday headed for the London mosque.
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Aog, do you object to ordinary people being prevented, and arrested if they try it, from walking down streets near a rugby ground when on their way to a match? If so, why?
And do you object to a law providing for police consent to a gathering or march when the aim is to prevent breaches of the peace or disturbance of the community? Why? The Public Order Act 1936, since replicated in later legilsation, was passed because of events like the "Battle of Cable Street" when Jews and other anti-fascists were involved in violence and breaches of the peace. You may be too young, but would you have objected to that law because it wasn't Mosley's organisation being violent (let us assume that is so) and it was exercising its free right to march?
And do you object to a law providing for police consent to a gathering or march when the aim is to prevent breaches of the peace or disturbance of the community? Why? The Public Order Act 1936, since replicated in later legilsation, was passed because of events like the "Battle of Cable Street" when Jews and other anti-fascists were involved in violence and breaches of the peace. You may be too young, but would you have objected to that law because it wasn't Mosley's organisation being violent (let us assume that is so) and it was exercising its free right to march?
THECORBYLOON
/// Anotheoldgit, there are hundreds of mosques in London but thousands of streets, do you honestly think that even in an area with a high percentage of Muslims, it is not possible to find a route avoiding any mosque? ///
So you are comfortable with the fact that your own British citizens can be prevented from walking past a Mosque?
Maybe we should stop Muslims walking past our Churches or go the whole hog and ban any protest march, or gathering, independent on who conducts them?
/// Anotheoldgit, there are hundreds of mosques in London but thousands of streets, do you honestly think that even in an area with a high percentage of Muslims, it is not possible to find a route avoiding any mosque? ///
So you are comfortable with the fact that your own British citizens can be prevented from walking past a Mosque?
Maybe we should stop Muslims walking past our Churches or go the whole hog and ban any protest march, or gathering, independent on who conducts them?
jomifl
/// No one has yet explained what is expected to happen if the 'knuckle dragger' walked past a mosque. I can only assume that nothing would happen, so why all the fuss? ///
Exactly, then if the EDL commit a crime against the Mosque or it's worshippers, then arrest and charge them, but on an equal basis if the EDL are attacked while passing the Mosque then the perpetrators of that attack should also be arrested and charged
/// No one has yet explained what is expected to happen if the 'knuckle dragger' walked past a mosque. I can only assume that nothing would happen, so why all the fuss? ///
Exactly, then if the EDL commit a crime against the Mosque or it's worshippers, then arrest and charge them, but on an equal basis if the EDL are attacked while passing the Mosque then the perpetrators of that attack should also be arrested and charged
Right on Freddie !
I hope the beasts dont remove this answer ! I'll be right joiled !
I was thinking of Oswald Mosley's marches thro the East End which were designed to be inflammatory. But I cant recollect if the 1936 Act took powers to redirect marches.
There was a lot about Balck Shirts because it is quite difficult to legislate Thous shalt not wear Black Shirts or Red SHorts or Orange Shirts.....into a sensible sectionof an Act of Parliament.
I was actually reading this this morning - John Locke and Rousseau believed/ taught under the social contract - that we give up some rights (int his case to march past a mosque ) in order to enjoy others - the right to march at all.
I apologise for lifting the leveel of this discussion out of the gutter
I hope the beasts dont remove this answer ! I'll be right joiled !
I was thinking of Oswald Mosley's marches thro the East End which were designed to be inflammatory. But I cant recollect if the 1936 Act took powers to redirect marches.
There was a lot about Balck Shirts because it is quite difficult to legislate Thous shalt not wear Black Shirts or Red SHorts or Orange Shirts.....into a sensible sectionof an Act of Parliament.
I was actually reading this this morning - John Locke and Rousseau believed/ taught under the social contract - that we give up some rights (int his case to march past a mosque ) in order to enjoy others - the right to march at all.
I apologise for lifting the leveel of this discussion out of the gutter
Gromit
/// Multiply those costs by an EDL demo every week and you can see they are costing (wasting) £millions of pounds each year. By nipping potential violence in the bud by using the law, the authorities are saving the local council tax payer £thousands in policing costs. ///
And you don't think that by providing an alternative route or a particular area for their protest. the police still won't deploy the same amount of man power and resources?
Perhaps the only way to save the money would be to ban all marches and protests? Yes I can see that would please some people, it's not just a matter of money.
/// Multiply those costs by an EDL demo every week and you can see they are costing (wasting) £millions of pounds each year. By nipping potential violence in the bud by using the law, the authorities are saving the local council tax payer £thousands in policing costs. ///
And you don't think that by providing an alternative route or a particular area for their protest. the police still won't deploy the same amount of man power and resources?
Perhaps the only way to save the money would be to ban all marches and protests? Yes I can see that would please some people, it's not just a matter of money.
Quite, aog. Assailants should be arrested and charged, as should those breaching the peace.
Now, what's your answer to my question (above) about preventing marches and gatherings which may lead to a breach of the peace or such violence?
jomifl, good to hear of your ancestral connections with the East End, but what was the point in your remark that Mosley "didn't did he?" Are you claiming that Mosley would not, did not, object to his marches being banned or directed?
Now, what's your answer to my question (above) about preventing marches and gatherings which may lead to a breach of the peace or such violence?
jomifl, good to hear of your ancestral connections with the East End, but what was the point in your remark that Mosley "didn't did he?" Are you claiming that Mosley would not, did not, object to his marches being banned or directed?
Gromit
/// If I was stopped going into a busy club because the bouncers thought I could cause trouble, does not make that place a 'No Go Area'. ///
It would be for you, which was exactly my point.
An area can be described as a no-go area, but it does not mean that no one at all can go in that area, that is blatantly obvious.
/// If I was stopped going into a busy club because the bouncers thought I could cause trouble, does not make that place a 'No Go Area'. ///
It would be for you, which was exactly my point.
An area can be described as a no-go area, but it does not mean that no one at all can go in that area, that is blatantly obvious.
Aog, I'll answer you. Perhaps you'll be so kind as to reciprocate by answering my questions.
The people who would be involved in, or start, the violence are Muslims and Muslim sympathisers. Now, how does that advance your argument? I ask again, since it was the Jews and their supporters who were responsible for violence at British Union of Fascists marches, would you have objected to the 1936 Public Order Act being passed? If so, why?
The people who would be involved in, or start, the violence are Muslims and Muslim sympathisers. Now, how does that advance your argument? I ask again, since it was the Jews and their supporters who were responsible for violence at British Union of Fascists marches, would you have objected to the 1936 Public Order Act being passed? If so, why?
// The avoidance of a potential breach of the peace, has been regularly banded about on this thread, but no one has been brave enough to mention who would be the ones who would be most likely breach the peace? //
Preceding the arrest, the Two EDL men were walking down a passage followed by the police. Two men walked in front and slowed them down. The EDL man pushes one of the men in the back and a scuffle takes place. All four were arrested. And that is before they got anywhere near to th mosque.
Preceding the arrest, the Two EDL men were walking down a passage followed by the police. Two men walked in front and slowed them down. The EDL man pushes one of the men in the back and a scuffle takes place. All four were arrested. And that is before they got anywhere near to th mosque.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.