"what is the opposition by BF to the Mosque all about then? I say its just naked racism...what do you think the cause is ?"
I don't know what BF's aims are, but I can guess: I imagine they think Islam (which is a religion, not a race, by the way) is a threat to British society, and want to stop it spreading. Now it is obviously true that many traditional Muslim attitudes (maybe "cultural" as much as religious) are incompatible with the norms of western society. I mean by "norms" such values and standards as freedom of speech, tolerance of religious and sexual diversity, the equality of the sexes, opposition to anti-Semitism (meaning anti-Jewish). It is equally incontestable that in those Muslim countries where these traditional attitudes are dominant "rights " predicated on western values (and taken for granted by us) are denied. So it follows (does it not?) that IF there are sufficiently large numbers of Muslims in the UK who follow traditional forms of Islam (maybe by recent immigration from , say, the Horn of Africa), then there will be at least a tension between the two incompatible cultures. IF, secondly, these traditional Muslims are unwilling to accommodate to western values (and you can understand very well why they might not), but expect accommodation to theirs, then friction will result. Now, both these propositions of mine may be false (or, maybe they are true now, but the traditional attitudes I describe will change fast). However, if both are true (and remain so) then BF (irrespective of its true character and any methods it may choose to promote its policies) is absolutely right in perceiving a threat, and wrong only in ascribing to a whole religion a threat posed by only a backward school of it.