Yorkshire Air Ambulance Comes In The...
Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Britain First - Paul Golding
455 Answers
Appears at court today but what of the charges he faces? The 'uniform' charge is bizarre to say the least. Short video in the link where Golding outlines the situation.
https:/
https:/
Answers
mikey, the mosque is being built on a car park adjacent to the station, which is a key commuting point for workers in London. as well as the loss of that facility, the local council has arranged a deal with the train company for the mosque to block-buy nearly 80 spaces in their own car park. thus aside from the disruption of the building work itself, the resultant...
10:57 Sun 09th Nov 2014
Thanks for Tuesday's post, Ellipsis. It was the third reply I've received to comments I've made, but the first to even hint that somebody had taken the bother to consider the point I was trying to make and respond coherently. However, you assumed I was talking about terrorism when I used the word "threat". I wasn't, I was talking about the cultural attitudes of some immigrant groups which are hostile to values which help to define what you would consider a civilised society. I gave examples in my first post.
As multi-culturism is not per se the topic of AG's post I'll stop banging on about it here and raise a post of my own on the subject. I invite you to contribute to it.
PS: I don't think Red Ken shares your views on vigilantism
As multi-culturism is not per se the topic of AG's post I'll stop banging on about it here and raise a post of my own on the subject. I invite you to contribute to it.
PS: I don't think Red Ken shares your views on vigilantism
v_e,
Good post. My thread has taken a few twists and turns and so it wouldn't have been out of place here but the points you raise would merit a separate post to do it justice.
The threat factor and lack of integration as well as addressing what constitutes a 'civilised society'?
What I would state in the meanwhile is that we are seeing more and more decisions made by local authorities, up and down the country, to grant the building of more mosques, against huge opposition from local communities and whose views are being overriden in favour of Islamic sensibilities.
Much has been said on here on the subject of multiculturism by people who rightly question the erosion of Christian heritage and tradition.
Who said Britain wasn't broken?
Good post. My thread has taken a few twists and turns and so it wouldn't have been out of place here but the points you raise would merit a separate post to do it justice.
The threat factor and lack of integration as well as addressing what constitutes a 'civilised society'?
What I would state in the meanwhile is that we are seeing more and more decisions made by local authorities, up and down the country, to grant the building of more mosques, against huge opposition from local communities and whose views are being overriden in favour of Islamic sensibilities.
Much has been said on here on the subject of multiculturism by people who rightly question the erosion of Christian heritage and tradition.
Who said Britain wasn't broken?
This explains the 'uniform' issue......
http://
......pretty much as I said.
http://
......pretty much as I said.
JTH
Your link and comments fail to address the point I have consistently made in this thread.
Golding was arrested following an incident on 3 April this year. He and others have regularly worn the clothing well before and after the said incident. There would have been umpteen opportunities to arrest him and others for the offence of wearing a political uniform but it didn't happen. Why was this? The only conclusion that can be drawn is that the authorities did not accept that the law had been infringed.
A charge of harassment[i has been brought also. For this to be proved, a charge of criminal harassment must have occurred on at least [i]two] occasions. However, the incident at the location only occurred once.
Your link and comments fail to address the point I have consistently made in this thread.
Golding was arrested following an incident on 3 April this year. He and others have regularly worn the clothing well before and after the said incident. There would have been umpteen opportunities to arrest him and others for the offence of wearing a political uniform but it didn't happen. Why was this? The only conclusion that can be drawn is that the authorities did not accept that the law had been infringed.
A charge of harassment[i has been brought also. For this to be proved, a charge of criminal harassment must have occurred on at least [i]two] occasions. However, the incident at the location only occurred once.
> The only conclusion that can be drawn is that the authorities did not accept that the law had been infringed.
You cannot be so naïve as to think that.
Whatever. What's important is that in the instance in which Golding was arrested, clearly the authorities did think that the law had been infringed.
You cannot be so naïve as to think that.
Whatever. What's important is that in the instance in which Golding was arrested, clearly the authorities did think that the law had been infringed.
JTH
Regarding the 'crown' issue, this is a different matter. As the link states, the question is whether the image contravenes both the Trade Descriptions Act and the Trades Mark Act and not whether it is a 'political uniform'.
In any event, BF have used the symbol for the best part of 4 years! Again, the authorities like to act fast!
How many of the numerous other organisations who feature a very similar crown have been charged with the same offences?
Regarding the 'crown' issue, this is a different matter. As the link states, the question is whether the image contravenes both the Trade Descriptions Act and the Trades Mark Act and not whether it is a 'political uniform'.
In any event, BF have used the symbol for the best part of 4 years! Again, the authorities like to act fast!
How many of the numerous other organisations who feature a very similar crown have been charged with the same offences?
http://
Guilty of harassment and wearing a political uniform.
Guilty of harassment and wearing a political uniform.
Latest Posts
News5 mins ago
Starmer And The Southpost Triple...
News11 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles12 mins ago
Film, Media & TV16 mins ago
