Business & Finance3 mins ago
Britain First - Paul Golding
455 Answers
Appears at court today but what of the charges he faces? The 'uniform' charge is bizarre to say the least. Short video in the link where Golding outlines the situation.
https:/
https:/
Answers
mikey, the mosque is being built on a car park adjacent to the station, which is a key commuting point for workers in London. as well as the loss of that facility, the local council has arranged a deal with the train company for the mosque to block-buy nearly 80 spaces in their own car park. thus aside from the disruption of the building work itself, the resultant...
10:57 Sun 09th Nov 2014
> anybody can buy
Again, thanks for that. Not advertising in any way ...
> The reason I mentioned the merchandise was purely because if anybody can buy and wear it in public they must be guilty too!
That's two separate issues - buying it and wearing it in public. Golding was not arrested for buying it, so why do you keep mentioning that it can be bought?
Again, thanks for that. Not advertising in any way ...
> The reason I mentioned the merchandise was purely because if anybody can buy and wear it in public they must be guilty too!
That's two separate issues - buying it and wearing it in public. Golding was not arrested for buying it, so why do you keep mentioning that it can be bought?
Ellipsis,
Let's try another way. Does it not stand to reason that if Golding is wearing anything which is freely available to wear, thenquote[any]wearer is in contravention of the 1936 Public Order Act which prohibits the wearing of political uniform in 'public places or public meetings'. I cannot put it any clearer than this.
Let's try another way. Does it not stand to reason that if Golding is wearing anything which is freely available to wear, thenquote[any]wearer is in contravention of the 1936 Public Order Act which prohibits the wearing of political uniform in 'public places or public meetings'. I cannot put it any clearer than this.
The propaganda value of the thread (to which you alluded earlier) benefits your side of the argument rather than AG's, doesn't it, Ellipsis? You've established (with good documentary evidence) the true character and lineage of the BF movement. So much so that nobody has yet attempted a total defence of BF as a political movement. The nearest to a defence of SOME BF policies came in a post which I wrote. Ichkeria and Mikey were able to expose very easily the fallacies in the case I presented, as well as the racist and Islamophobic attitudes implicit in my arguments. Having different standards of logic and truth from them I wasn't that impressed by their rebuttals, but obviously you and others were as you saw no need to support or add to their posts. Nonetheless, I applaud the zeal with which you and the other good guys on this thread oppose the bullying, coercion and intimidation of this country's law-abiding citizens by some fascist organisations..
Sorry to offer you poor comfort, AG, but I think BF are probably much as Mikey etc. portray them, so I'm not in the least interested in arguing for or against Mr. Golding and his uniform, the subject of your OP. The point I was trying to make to the purblind (after reading the expected Pavlovian responses to the OP) is that there are factions (that's spelled F A C T I O N S, Mikey, geddit?) in the Muslim community which pose bigger threats to civilised values and the rule of law in the UK than any which have been, are being, or will be posed by BF, the EDL, the BNP or (back when I was a boy) the old National Front of Tindall and co. Ellipsis and mates would be better employed assessing the extent of that threat: it's the one that gives succour to the neo-fascist organisations which disturb Mikey's sleep.
v_e
No comfort required thanks ;-)
You have though made a good point about perspective. Who should be feared the most? For those who cry 'alarmist' should wake up to the threat posed from Islamic extremists which is evidenced by the current official threat level.
Answerprancer
Keep up, that's the third time that link has been posted. I've commented on this way back.
No comfort required thanks ;-)
You have though made a good point about perspective. Who should be feared the most? For those who cry 'alarmist' should wake up to the threat posed from Islamic extremists which is evidenced by the current official threat level.
Answerprancer
Keep up, that's the third time that link has been posted. I've commented on this way back.
-- answer removed --
> Ellipsis and mates would be better employed assessing the extent of that threat
As I said earlier in the thread, I like the rule of law so naturally I dislike both terrorism and vigilantism. I do not trust vigilantes to make my country a safer place. In fact I think, like terrorists, vigilantes make my country a more dangerous place.
> Who should be feared the most?
Both terrorism and vigilantism are to be abhorred. The difference between them can be quite small, depending just how political the vigilante's aims and just how far the vigilante is prepared to push things, as this definition shows:
terrorism: the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
As I said earlier in the thread, I like the rule of law so naturally I dislike both terrorism and vigilantism. I do not trust vigilantes to make my country a safer place. In fact I think, like terrorists, vigilantes make my country a more dangerous place.
> Who should be feared the most?
Both terrorism and vigilantism are to be abhorred. The difference between them can be quite small, depending just how political the vigilante's aims and just how far the vigilante is prepared to push things, as this definition shows:
terrorism: the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
Part of this thread has involved discussing the issue of Medway's decision to approve the building of a mosque. Last night, we have this from Dudley:-
http://
http://
Latest Posts
Crosswords4 mins ago
Society & Culture7 mins ago
Crosswords24 mins ago
Road rules46 mins ago
