ChatterBank1 min ago
Britain First - Paul Golding
455 Answers
Appears at court today but what of the charges he faces? The 'uniform' charge is bizarre to say the least. Short video in the link where Golding outlines the situation.
https:/
https:/
Answers
mikey, the mosque is being built on a car park adjacent to the station, which is a key commuting point for workers in London. as well as the loss of that facility, the local council has arranged a deal with the train company for the mosque to block-buy nearly 80 spaces in their own car park. thus aside from the disruption of the building work itself, the resultant...
10:57 Sun 09th Nov 2014
The offence exists.
He allegedly committed it.
They charged him for it.
What more do you need to know? Why they never charged him for it before?
I would guess it's because, before, he didn't unearth an address that was known to the authorities and not released to the general public, dress up in uniform, go to that address and harass the occupants at that address, rather than let the appropriate legal agencies handle it.
Once he did that, they threw the book at him and charged him with everything they possibly could - including the uniform offence.
He allegedly committed it.
They charged him for it.
What more do you need to know? Why they never charged him for it before?
I would guess it's because, before, he didn't unearth an address that was known to the authorities and not released to the general public, dress up in uniform, go to that address and harass the occupants at that address, rather than let the appropriate legal agencies handle it.
Once he did that, they threw the book at him and charged him with everything they possibly could - including the uniform offence.
Inconsistent? Doesn't it matter that he (allegedly) broke the law? Is all that matters that he'd gotten away with it before so he should have been allowed to get away with it again? And for not letting him, you call the authorities "vindictive"?
I don't even know whether wearing a uniform on a march is against the law. Maybe it isn't, which would explain the apparent inconsistency. What does appear to be against the law is wearing a uniform while behaving like a vigilante.
I don't even know whether wearing a uniform on a march is against the law. Maybe it isn't, which would explain the apparent inconsistency. What does appear to be against the law is wearing a uniform while behaving like a vigilante.
-- answer removed --
Sorry agchristie, but that's not really evidence is it?
> My own view on why he is being charged (with anything) is that "the authorities" in this country have always deplored people who act in any way above the law (look how judges always come down hard on what they see as contempt)
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
> My own view on why he is being charged (with anything) is that "the authorities" in this country have always deplored people who act in any way above the law (look how judges always come down hard on what they see as contempt)
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
> All the clothing is available online
That's good to know, thanks. I can't think why you wrote that though, as you're not a BF supporter and the purpose of this thread is not to promote BF, its website and their clothing. And the reason you keep asking the same question over and over again isn't because you want to prolong the thread and keep it in Latest Posts for the propaganda value it offers ...
That's good to know, thanks. I can't think why you wrote that though, as you're not a BF supporter and the purpose of this thread is not to promote BF, its website and their clothing. And the reason you keep asking the same question over and over again isn't because you want to prolong the thread and keep it in Latest Posts for the propaganda value it offers ...
Ellipsis,
The reason I mentioned the merchandise was purely because if anybody can buy and wear it in public they must be guilty too!
You really must drop these allegations of propaganda and promotion. The needle is stuck on the record. You are ploughing a lone furrow here not to mention playing your part in extending this thread...
The reason I mentioned the merchandise was purely because if anybody can buy and wear it in public they must be guilty too!
You really must drop these allegations of propaganda and promotion. The needle is stuck on the record. You are ploughing a lone furrow here not to mention playing your part in extending this thread...
