Donate SIGN UP

Only In America. Is This A Price They're Willing To Continue To Pay For The Right To Carry Arms?

Avatar Image
sandyRoe | 14:34 Wed 26th Aug 2015 | News
103 Answers
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 103rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yet another mad American with a gun...we have been here so many times before.
I'm cracking up....

//unless an event of cataclysmic proportions that makes the movement of the San Andreas Fault or Mount McKinley blowing its top look tame, the Americans are not going to repeal the amendment//
As I mentioned earlier, the uphill battle is not just with the huge amount of guns in circulation, it is the ‘frontier’ mentality in America which continues to believe that owning a gun is a right.

It is a right, under the law, but with rights come responsibilities, and it is here that the entire ethos falls down.

The mind-set that Americans should be able to protect themselves with guns is deeply embedded, and whereas virtually every other aspect of the culture that laid down the right in the first place has evolved out of recognition, this particular idea remains steadfast.
I love one of the sub-statements in your link, Eddie, 'screen-shots' - no way!
In the decade following the Labor party's election and banning of handguns in 1997, the number of recorded violent attacks in the U.K. soared by 77% to 1.2 million in '07.
A recent study published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy concluded that there is a negative correlation between gun ownership and violent crime in countries internationally.

Nations with strict gun control laws have substantially higher murder rates than those who do not, in general. In fact, the 9 European nations with the lowest gun ownership rate, have a murder rate 3X that of the 9 European countries with the highest gun ownership rate. (Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/5712573/UK-is-violent-crime-capital-of-Europe.html )

In the UK, possession of handguns is illegal, yet there are 2034 violent crimes per 100,000 persons compared to 466 violent crimes per 100,000 people in the U.S. (Source: ibid)

In the decade following the Labor party's election and banning of handguns in 1997, the number of recorded violent attacks soared by 77% to 1.2 million in 2007- or more than 2 attacks every minute. Kitchen knives are being used in as many as half of all stabbings in the United Kingdom and has prompted a group of doctors to call for a ban on long, pointed kitchen knives in the UK.
(Source: BBC News:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4581871.stm )

In the US statistics in 2012 indicate found that states that adopted concealed carry laws reduced murders by 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assault by 7.5% and robberies by 3.2% (Source:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2012/12/5gun-free-zone-john-lott/1791085)

Despite strict gun regulations, Europe has had 3 of the worst 6 school shootings. (Source: ibid)

In 1982, Kennesaw, Georgia passed a law requiring heads of house-holds to keep at least one firearm in their house. The residential burglary rate dropped 89% in Kennesaw as compared to 10.4% in the rest of the State of Georgia. Today, the violent crime rate in Kennesaw is 85% lower that the State of Georgia or the balance of the US.
Among other valid statistics is a 11.3% error rate of police responding to violent crime vs. a 2% error rate by armed citizens response to crime.
Clanad, you stats are rubbish and your interpretation of them is what we expect from someone in deep denial.
why jomifl? one could argue the same thing as to your generalism. Counter with with your proof, please.
-- answer removed --
I wonder if in this context "error rate" means "shooting dead the wrong person"?
Clanad Your figures seem to be at odds with these, where did you get them?
http://www.humanosphere.org/science/2014/03/visualizing-gun-deaths-comparing-the-u-s-to-rest-of-the-world/
USA is not the top of the world league in gun death by % of population, Honduras has that distinction, but it is far ahead of any country in Europe
Only in America???

How about this on the streets of London in July, similar crime

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3156726/Man-killed-woman-left-fighting-life-gunned-broad-daylight-London-street.html
No-one can possibly believe that allowing more violent and dangerous weapons into society makes that society safer as a result. Americans seem to have this concept of "so long as the right people has guns it keeps the wrong people in check" -- but this makes the, often very deadly, mistake of assuming that good people stay good, when in fact often they can just snap. Give someone who snaps a gun and they can do far, far more damage than without.

All the same, nothing will change. In part because, sadly, with guns now already out there it is unlikely that banning guns will be all that effective. In part also, because some people insist on spreading the illusion that guns make people safer. But if the guy you are trying to defend yourself from also has a gun then all that's happened is that both people have gained the same advantage, and in relative terms nothing has changed really.
-- answer removed --
DTC if you want an uninterpreted set of stats perhaps the following table will make it clear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

Roughly 40 times the gun death per capita in the US as compared with UK
I see Eddie has come up with a similar figure too ...how difficult was that?
This table confounds the assertion that counries with strict gun laws have a higher rate of violence than those without.
The US has a murder rate 4.7 times higher than the UK.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
YMF // No, they would stab them with a knife or a car or any other implement to hand. Cliche or not it is true.//

er no it is a cliche and it is also the usual YMF bullshot

If it were true then the 10 000 or so shotgun deaths in the land of the free would be reflected by 10 000 stabbed in other countries( depending on how easy access to guns were )

and in ENgland and Wales for example it iiiiiiiissss ... 560

OK adjusting for population 10000 compared to 2 000
still varies by a factor of five (400%)

[ being stabbed with a car o honestly .... ]
hooray did it myself without Jomifl's stats !
// In the UK, possession of handguns is illegal, yet there are 2034 violent crimes per 100,000 persons compared to 466 violent crimes per 100,000 people in the U.S. (Source: ibid) //

2034 violent crimes in dear old blighty per 100 000 - is 10 000 per population of the UK - and note how he weasels: possession of handguns is illegal and so we are led by stealth and lies to think that there are 10 000 gun crimes in the UK - there arent
Clanad - naughty boy - is bullshotting ....

Manc for example - a gun has been shot within the population of some 3.5 m some thirty times over the last year - peanuts about once every two weeks

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/gun-crime-manchester-salford-rise-9723072

the shootings in Momenta represent all Manchester gun crime for all partsof the city for the next four months

21 to 40 of 103rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Only In America. Is This A Price They're Willing To Continue To Pay For The Right To Carry Arms?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.