Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Is This Photo Amazing Or Whats Your Take On It?
well what do you think?
Media URL: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36759711
Description:
Description:
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Gromit, Ah, right. You’re extolling the aesthetically pleasing aspects of the picture. It must have been you saying things like, “We can argue, that that is not the case in every victim of a police shooting”, that confused me – and the placement of this item in News rather than in Arts & Literature. Do carry on. I’ll go elsewhere to talk about News.
Re: Page 3 of this thread
http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/News /Questi on15020 54-3.ht ml
and the Talbot/jno exchange, I'm not sure jno's point about proportionally was acknowledged fully.
Even the Grauniad's statistics page didn't address this
http:// 4.bp.bl ogspot. com/-No 2377MRF YU/VW9p szU2b0I /AAAAAA AAg5Q/h hWKOKg8 DCw/s16 00/guar dian-th e_count ed-1018 .jpg
choosing absolute numbers (which serves Talbot's stance) in preference to proprtional ones, which supports the #BLM side of things.
The Facebook post linked to was very well written and bang on the money: if it's Baltimore, with a BME majority population, it will "ALWAYS be more" whether it is black on black killings or killings by cops. Clustering of populations of minority groups is a fact which should be acknowledged. Nobody likes to move that far from their close family and/or social network. "The fruit doesn't fall far from the tree".
But if they're only 13% (say) of the population then, proportionately, they shouldn't be suffering nearly half as many deaths as whites. But, as per the Facebook post, tracking like-for-like arrest situations, suspect behaviours and outcomes is a complex piece of analysis, beyond a single individual's capacity to work out in their head. Computers might manage the task but who do you trust to do the programming?
http://
and the Talbot/jno exchange, I'm not sure jno's point about proportionally was acknowledged fully.
Even the Grauniad's statistics page didn't address this
http://
choosing absolute numbers (which serves Talbot's stance) in preference to proprtional ones, which supports the #BLM side of things.
The Facebook post linked to was very well written and bang on the money: if it's Baltimore, with a BME majority population, it will "ALWAYS be more" whether it is black on black killings or killings by cops. Clustering of populations of minority groups is a fact which should be acknowledged. Nobody likes to move that far from their close family and/or social network. "The fruit doesn't fall far from the tree".
But if they're only 13% (say) of the population then, proportionately, they shouldn't be suffering nearly half as many deaths as whites. But, as per the Facebook post, tracking like-for-like arrest situations, suspect behaviours and outcomes is a complex piece of analysis, beyond a single individual's capacity to work out in their head. Computers might manage the task but who do you trust to do the programming?
I look at the picture and I read some blurred, emotive,over dramatic drivel being spouted by the ignorant.
(a)Storm trooper? . They are police officers wearing suitable protective clothing to face potential bricks, bottles or other lethal missiles. They are facing a potential hostile mob. I call that brave. Of course some on here have never done public service and worn a uniform except a woggle and a scarf!
(b) Heavily armed?? Really?? They are carrying no more than standard sidearm but don't let your pathetic exaggeration distort the facts.
If you want to be less dramatic and more accurate they could be described as heavily armoured. See (a) above for the necessity re protection. They have already seen 5 of their own killed and others injured whilst performing their duty at a black march!!
(a)Storm trooper? . They are police officers wearing suitable protective clothing to face potential bricks, bottles or other lethal missiles. They are facing a potential hostile mob. I call that brave. Of course some on here have never done public service and worn a uniform except a woggle and a scarf!
(b) Heavily armed?? Really?? They are carrying no more than standard sidearm but don't let your pathetic exaggeration distort the facts.
If you want to be less dramatic and more accurate they could be described as heavily armoured. See (a) above for the necessity re protection. They have already seen 5 of their own killed and others injured whilst performing their duty at a black march!!
-- answer removed --
Here's another very interesting article for some posters to not bother reading.
I will post the main point for the lazy
''when it comes to the most lethal form of force - police shootings - the study finds no racial bias''
http:// www.zer ohedge. com/new s/2016- 07-11/h arvard- study-f inds-no -racial -bias-p olice-s hooting s
I will post the main point for the lazy
''when it comes to the most lethal form of force - police shootings - the study finds no racial bias''
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.