ChatterBank1 min ago
Martin Mcguiness Dies.
What is in NI's future now? According to George Galloway everyone in NI wants a united Ireland! What planet is he on!
Answers
Galloway is on planet Galloway. A complete irrelevance to anything sensible. I hope Mr McGuinness's death will spur the politicians on to agreement in the current difficult circumstance s. In the end he was a major figure in the peace process and his death is a sad event. He proved that people can change for the better.
07:38 Tue 21st Mar 2017
There were two strands to Lord Tebbit's argument in the interview I listened to earlier. Firstly he claimed that Martin McGuinness was a coward because he thought that if he didn't sue for peace he might have have been arrested. It's certainly true that one reason the IRA were willing to sue for peace was because they realised they could not win, it this is also true on the British side, which negates Tebbir's other main point, namely that only a military victory would defeat the IRA. This, he reminded us, was the view of Airey Neave, brutally murdered by the INLA in 1979. Events of course were to prove that view wrong. So while I have every sympathy for Kord Tebbit for what he personally suffered at the hands of Martin McGuinness's organisation, his analysis of what happened , or what should have happened, is out of date and wrong.
-- answer removed --
no I think itch is not so much a fan of McG
but wonders at the life cycle
it seems reasonable to suggest that Martin McG just got tired of killing
does happen
famous case of a palestinian policeman ( English of course ) arresting a member of Irgun who was armed and disguised as a rabbi - the armed fella didnt shoot the unarmed one but instead let himself be arrested. Later hanged ( by the british)
stimulated debate for 50y on the lines - why did he give up and why didnt he just shoot the unarmed officer ?
but wonders at the life cycle
it seems reasonable to suggest that Martin McG just got tired of killing
does happen
famous case of a palestinian policeman ( English of course ) arresting a member of Irgun who was armed and disguised as a rabbi - the armed fella didnt shoot the unarmed one but instead let himself be arrested. Later hanged ( by the british)
stimulated debate for 50y on the lines - why did he give up and why didnt he just shoot the unarmed officer ?
“New judge? Old prejudices.”
There is no prejudice on my part, old or new, allen. Prejudice definition:
“an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason.”
My opinion of Mr McGuiness has not been formed beforehand or without knowledge. It has been formed with the benefit of hindsight and what has happened over the past forty years or so. I do not rejoice at the news of anybody’s death, however odious they may be. But neither do I bestow post-mortem adulation on somebody as a hero of peace when in an earlier life he was involved, at quite a high level, in a campaign of violence and terror. The notion that he was to be applauded because he was instrumental in the “peace process” (which, as has been mentioned, had some less than savoury aspects, though that’s another argument) when he was firstly instrumental in the terror campaign that required such peace to be pursued, would be laughable were it not so serious.
There is no prejudice on my part, old or new, allen. Prejudice definition:
“an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason.”
My opinion of Mr McGuiness has not been formed beforehand or without knowledge. It has been formed with the benefit of hindsight and what has happened over the past forty years or so. I do not rejoice at the news of anybody’s death, however odious they may be. But neither do I bestow post-mortem adulation on somebody as a hero of peace when in an earlier life he was involved, at quite a high level, in a campaign of violence and terror. The notion that he was to be applauded because he was instrumental in the “peace process” (which, as has been mentioned, had some less than savoury aspects, though that’s another argument) when he was firstly instrumental in the terror campaign that required such peace to be pursued, would be laughable were it not so serious.
-- answer removed --
He was an intelligent man and incredibly dangerous. I have no sympathy for him. Like NJ, my old man and I came close when we were at the Earl's Court boat show and they blew up a Riva - we had just been on it and were interviewed by the police...... He was/is destined for level 9 to 12 in Hell if it exists, the further the better.....his only redemption was that perhaps he had the foresight to seeing the change of winds, north and south of the border and further field in the UK, the EU and even the States - and he adapted accordingly and helped catalyse change.
I liked the remark where in his death, the current stand-off is resolved but then the DUP need to chuck out their seemingly corrupt leader.
I liked the remark where in his death, the current stand-off is resolved but then the DUP need to chuck out their seemingly corrupt leader.
Sadly tho NJ that is the way of the world. In an ideal place, we'd wave away all the 'baddies' and the 'goodies' would just take over. Simple. In N Ireland ironically it was the 'extremist' parties in each side who were voted into power and everyone thought that that would be that. And yet it was not. It necessitated those who had the most to lose and the least to gain and who had been the most cynical about the intentions of the other side, to come together and .. agree. Often it's ONLY the chief protagonists in a conflict who can ultimately solve it.
The truth is that no one has a monopoly on good or evil: in fact on a personal level McGuinness was far from odious, and that fact helped build bridges there no doubt. I guess it's called the 'human factor' after all.
The truth is that no one has a monopoly on good or evil: in fact on a personal level McGuinness was far from odious, and that fact helped build bridges there no doubt. I guess it's called the 'human factor' after all.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Now that he has died I am glad that he is meeting his maker and do not believe that he can be admitted to Heaven; he repaid some of his evils however and that is not up to me. That he did do good things later can be recognised and offset. I am, t.b.h., appalled and upset at the amount of coverage seeking to minimise the carnage for which he was responsible and can quite understand Lord Tebbit. A mere reporting of his death would have been enough and the reaction demonstrates the twisted values of today.
The news programmes of (it seems) all channels are horribly, heavily slewed. Youngsters would have understood that McGuinness was a John Wayne type of character. His responsibility for killings and maimings is being glossed over.
The news programmes of (it seems) all channels are horribly, heavily slewed. Youngsters would have understood that McGuinness was a John Wayne type of character. His responsibility for killings and maimings is being glossed over.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.