retrocop - // Naomi
I would hate to play Poker with some on AB. Their Trump (what he allegedly said) out trumps what he disclosed i.e. th systematic grooming by Muslim/Asian gangs on vulnerable young children plus the complicity of the Rochdale Labour predominant Muslim Council and cover up by the Chief Constable of the Police Authority. The threats made to social sevice whistleblowers etc etc.
That counts for nothing for those who preside at the Kangaroo courts and cannot cite anything specific except what they heard. //
I think we are in danger of drifting off the point of the OP here -
we are not debating what Tommy Robinson has done or said in the past, or the rights and wrongs of what he believes.
The debate is about whether or not his being banned from Facebook and Instagram makes him a bad person or not.
The thrust of the posts thus far seems to be arguing about what posts have caused this response, although I believe that this is not relavent.
Facebook's authorities have decided to delete 'Tommy Robinson's accounts because he has breached their rules of conduct.
The issue of what he has said is not what the OP addressed, and so far no-one seems to know which specific posts are involved.
But again, that is not relevant. It is not for us to decide if Facebook were right or wrong, it is a matter for them as the site owners to act as they see fit to protect their site legally and morally from unwelcome posts, and this they have done.
People can think that 'Tommy Robinson' is a mis-treated hero grievously wronged, or that he is a gobby idiot who got what he deserved, neither matters. The action has been taken, and as I have pointed out, an individual as habitually litigious as 'Tommy Robinson' will waste no time in gearing up a robust and very public legal defence of his good name.
We shall see.