Donate SIGN UP

Civil Unrest Anyone?

Avatar Image
diddlydo | 22:44 Wed 28th Aug 2019 | News
183 Answers
Who'd like to join those like me in protest against Johnson's undemocratic behaviour?
Gravatar

Answers

81 to 100 of 183rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last

Avatar Image
The thing everyone on both sides seems to be losing sight of in the wild clamour to have their own way is that each and every person has a right, and in fact a duty, to do what they consider right for the country, and that includes Remainers. I still hold that leaving the EU will be catastrophic economically, socially and will lead to unprecendented hardship for...
01:11 Thu 29th Aug 2019
The debate on Advisory/Binding has rumbled on from day one along with the rest of the debacle - it does not make someone a liar to state that.

One site outlining it here , there are others if you look.

https://fullfact.org/europe/was-eu-referendum-advisory/
Leavers specifically had a chance to convince folk that losing sovereignty and being a member of a trading block which considerably improved our economy was a bad thing.
Putting it kindly, that the referendum was ‘advisory only’ is a spurious argument – yet another smoke screen. Every major political party declared its intention to respect the result of the referendum, the government vowed to deliver on that result, and parliament voted overwhelmingly to trigger A50.
Might as well wash your hair Bobbisox.
Apparently lunch isn't supplied;-(
Diddly - What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. If Remainers were to succeed in frustrating Brexit would you condone civil unrest by committed Leavers?

"It was never anything other than an advisory referendum"

How many times must this be countered ? Due to a poor system it was legally only advisory, but that was irrelevant since it was stated that it would be acted upon. One doesn't spend a fortune on something one intends to ignore if one doesn't like the result. And parliament accepted this and started the process. So this advisory nonsense is a red herring, always was, but continually brought up as if it had some relevance by remoaners.

"Not something which should ever have been put to the people"

Of course it had to be. There's been growing discontent with this federalist agenda for ages. The government didn't have the guts to get out, parliament as a whole still doesn't and thus fail in their job of representing the opinion of the country, but clearly it was the will of the people they are supposed to represent and so it was necessary that their voice was heard. Fortunately Cameron thought it'd solve a problem for him so offered it. Government aren't usually that democratic but should be on major decisions.

Democracy is not preserved by stopping a democratic decision simply because some don't agree with it. That is the antithesis of democracy.

Whatever Farage intended when he said he'd continue the fight if it went the way of remain, it isn't really comparable to the damage remoaners are causing now. It was his "baby", his long term goal to convince others to get out of a federal Europe. He had no power other than persuasion and if he wanted to continue to do that then the effect on the nation would be subtle. And if he (or remainers now) wanted to call for another vote in a few decades time, then fair enough.
why won't the remainers accept that" leave" was voted for democratically.
Well that's a definite no-no for me then lozzy,no lunch provided you say? Pfft!
People had their chance to do "what is right for the country" at the referendum, the fairest vote ever held in this country. If they couldnt be bothered to get out of bed to vote the fault is theirs so cluttering up the streets of London is just sour grapes in the extreme. The ballot paper was to leave the EU, no need for a deal or no deal was specified, so that argument is irrelevant. Many remain MPs will be unemployed after the next GE for not respecting the instructions of their constituents regardless of party.
C.A.P, that's so worthy of a best answer, sadly tho not here
So I'm told Bobbisox.
I was looking forward to firing up my mobility scooter, rampaging down High street smashing shop windows, looting along the way, then having a civilised cup of tea and some scones in a nice little cafe along with other Abers.
I'm loving all the squeals of "undemocratic" from the VBQC, after they've spent 3 years trying to ride roughshod over democracy.
Jesus Tora, you're worse than daytime telly on Dave for repeats.
ZM:"Surely this is a democratic process? A democratically elected Govt using parliamentary law. Surely nothing more democratic than that?" - you are an imposter, what have you done with the real ZM?
'not something which should have ever been put to the people' That's the biggest load of codswallop I've read on here and believe me, I've read some !! You only got BA calicogirl because you are one of the minority on here who agrees with the OP ..
Who claims to know the mind of diddlydo?
One referendum to Stay yet two referendums to leave. Where was the democracy there?
//'not something which should have ever been put to the people' //

Oh dear. So much for power to the people! Corbyn and his cronies would love you, Calicogirl. 'Do as I say - not as I do'.
I thought there was an anti-Brexit rally planned in London for October 17th, so perhaps diddlydo could join that. I'm sure they could indulge in a bit of civil unrest as well if required. Don't think I'll be there being a believer in democracy.
//One referendum to Stay yet two referendums to leave. Where was the democracy there?//
Three referenda ? I must have missed two of them.

81 to 100 of 183rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Civil Unrest Anyone?

Answer Question >>