Society & Culture3 mins ago
Off Duty Police Headbutter
305 Answers
Ahh it all makes sense now! The sadism of the met. Vile. I can not believe the off duty cop isn't facing retribution. Reasonable force? Pffft. What kind of example does this set! Absolutely vile.
https:/ /news.y ahoo.co m/man-h eadbutt ed-pass enger-t rain-po lice-of ficer-1 2233809 1.html
https:/
Answers
As has been said the guy was already restrained If this copper is willing to head butt the guy in full glare of the public ; when any threat was already neutralised ;i wonder what he is prepared to do to other people , when there is no one around in a non life threatening situation . Whatever you think of the guy is irrelevant in the circumstance s I certainly wouldn't...
12:30 Thu 10th Oct 2019
It says 'on suspicion' so no revision required.
___________________
EVERYBODY whi is arrested is done so 'on suspicion'.
Splat claims there was no knife from the outset..........I'd hazard that following a subsequent search and a second arrest that a knife was discovered, as was the theft by finding offence(I wonder if the discovery of the knife had anything to do with him being cleared of any offence by those investigating the officer? Whadyareckon?), but bravo for answering for Splat.
___________________
EVERYBODY whi is arrested is done so 'on suspicion'.
Splat claims there was no knife from the outset..........I'd hazard that following a subsequent search and a second arrest that a knife was discovered, as was the theft by finding offence(I wonder if the discovery of the knife had anything to do with him being cleared of any offence by those investigating the officer? Whadyareckon?), but bravo for answering for Splat.
ChillDoubt - // It says 'on suspicion' so no revision required.
___________________
EVERYBODY whi is arrested is done so 'on suspicion'. //
Precisely!!!
Which is why the constant jumping to conclusions so beloved of a few on here is so pointless, because no-one knows anything until the investigation is completed, so everyone on here is guessing, as usual.
// Splat claims there was no knife from the outset..........I'd hazard that following a subsequent search and a second arrest that a knife was discovered … //
There you go again, 'hazarding' is guessing, and I've already explained why that is pointless, but feel free, there's no charge (pun absolutely intended!) for doing it.
// Whadyareckon? //
I reckon you are guessing, which is pointless, but aa regular hobby of some on here.
// ... but bravo for answering for Splat. //
I don't ever answer for anyone, just myself.
___________________
EVERYBODY whi is arrested is done so 'on suspicion'. //
Precisely!!!
Which is why the constant jumping to conclusions so beloved of a few on here is so pointless, because no-one knows anything until the investigation is completed, so everyone on here is guessing, as usual.
// Splat claims there was no knife from the outset..........I'd hazard that following a subsequent search and a second arrest that a knife was discovered … //
There you go again, 'hazarding' is guessing, and I've already explained why that is pointless, but feel free, there's no charge (pun absolutely intended!) for doing it.
// Whadyareckon? //
I reckon you are guessing, which is pointless, but aa regular hobby of some on here.
// ... but bravo for answering for Splat. //
I don't ever answer for anyone, just myself.
jno - // andy - sorry for going off-topic but the other thread is closed - apologies if I seemed to be suggesting you were excusing Savile, I well know you weren't. //
Thanks very much jno - apologies for my phone's relentless correction of your name btw.
I am aware that you would not think I was excusing Jimmy Savile, but the post I wrote was more for the benefit of other people who could start a fight in an empty phone box with no money, and would doubtless have leapt in once again without my clarification.
Thanks very much jno - apologies for my phone's relentless correction of your name btw.
I am aware that you would not think I was excusing Jimmy Savile, but the post I wrote was more for the benefit of other people who could start a fight in an empty phone box with no money, and would doubtless have leapt in once again without my clarification.
Chilldoubt, if you think that after being searched, there would be no suspicion. Fact is, there still way. He didn't get arrested or fined or charged for carrying an offensive weapon he got arrested on suspicion of carrying a knife they're not one and the same, but someone with a barbarianism wrecking ball ideology about violence like yourself, i'm sure wouldn't comprehend.
Fact is, the articles mentioned the word knife, no article every actually confirm if he had a knife on him, some articles didn't even mention the word knife!
In this day and age, on public transport, when there is a terrorist threat, best believe me they would have forced the fact he had an offensive weapon down your throat and used it to justify the action of the met.
In this day and age, on public transport, when there is a terrorist threat, best believe me they would have forced the fact he had an offensive weapon down your throat and used it to justify the action of the met.
At least you're not so blind in your hatred for the man that you can't see that he was in fact apprehended.
Now that's clear, it really is a case of personal opinion of what's acceptable or not. I personally think not, you think so. Fair play.
I assume then, if one of your family members, or yourself got drunk at the pub, to be held up against the wall by 3 other men, if they deem it appropriate, they can headbutt you in the face if they think you deserve it?
I personally think absolutely not, but you think, if they think it's OK and if they think you deserve it, then it would be perfectly OK.
Now that's clear, it really is a case of personal opinion of what's acceptable or not. I personally think not, you think so. Fair play.
I assume then, if one of your family members, or yourself got drunk at the pub, to be held up against the wall by 3 other men, if they deem it appropriate, they can headbutt you in the face if they think you deserve it?
I personally think absolutely not, but you think, if they think it's OK and if they think you deserve it, then it would be perfectly OK.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.