Crosswords1 min ago
Coronavirus: Has Anyone Had A Bit Of A Cold In The Past Couple Of Months?
I have, so here’s hoping.
// The coronavirus could have infected as much as half of the the UK’s population, according to researchers at the University of Oxford. If accurate, the results would mean the country has already acquired substantial “herd immunity” through the unrecognised spread of the illness.
The shutdown across the UK could be removed much sooner expected if the findings are confirmed //
https:/
A light on the horizon perhaps?
// The coronavirus could have infected as much as half of the the UK’s population, according to researchers at the University of Oxford. If accurate, the results would mean the country has already acquired substantial “herd immunity” through the unrecognised spread of the illness.
The shutdown across the UK could be removed much sooner expected if the findings are confirmed //
https:/
A light on the horizon perhaps?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Jim, people are people. They’ll believe whatever they want to believe - and if they don’t read it and say it here they’ll read it and say it somewhere else. I find some of your ideas really weird but I’ve never attempted to stop you talking about them.
This is a list of what are considered to be pseudosciences:
https:/
….. all of which, on a board such as this which caters for practically every subject under the sun, should be open to discussion, scrutiny and, if warranted, criticism.
People don’t come here to be lectured, Jim - there are some pretty smart cookies around - albeit they don’t trumpet their achievements - so I can only suggest you either rescind your request, return your quality controller's badge, and if you’re still interested, accept the site for what it is - or failing that, rather than spoil the potential of the place for others, seek a specialist board better suited to your own personal requirements.
//there's nothing to stop you still posting there yourself.//
Actually, Jim, there is. Principle aside, I won’t work to construct answers when there’s a distinct possibility that my efforts, having fallen short of requirements, will disappear. Until this reprehensible situation is remedied the Science section is not somewhere I want to be.
This is a list of what are considered to be pseudosciences:
https:/
….. all of which, on a board such as this which caters for practically every subject under the sun, should be open to discussion, scrutiny and, if warranted, criticism.
People don’t come here to be lectured, Jim - there are some pretty smart cookies around - albeit they don’t trumpet their achievements - so I can only suggest you either rescind your request, return your quality controller's badge, and if you’re still interested, accept the site for what it is - or failing that, rather than spoil the potential of the place for others, seek a specialist board better suited to your own personal requirements.
//there's nothing to stop you still posting there yourself.//
Actually, Jim, there is. Principle aside, I won’t work to construct answers when there’s a distinct possibility that my efforts, having fallen short of requirements, will disappear. Until this reprehensible situation is remedied the Science section is not somewhere I want to be.
Very much true. I might have been unable to shut up about it, but, as the editorial team made clear, "These changes are mostly a clarification, not anything new."
As to courage of my convictions, I come here to bash my head against a brick wall precisely because of them. Trying desperately to communicate how science actually works, rather than the twisted version of it often presented, is worth the fight.
As to courage of my convictions, I come here to bash my head against a brick wall precisely because of them. Trying desperately to communicate how science actually works, rather than the twisted version of it often presented, is worth the fight.
// You've taken it upon yourself to conduct lectures that no one has requested.//
oh come on, brain on
this is Answerbank - yeah? and he is a theoretical physicist,
so any scientific thing he says is worf listening to
it is more than 1 + 1 = 2 because maths has got beyond that - around 500 y ago - there is alot to catch up on
oh come on, brain on
this is Answerbank - yeah? and he is a theoretical physicist,
so any scientific thing he says is worf listening to
it is more than 1 + 1 = 2 because maths has got beyond that - around 500 y ago - there is alot to catch up on
I still think you should retrain in Law Jim
Lord McKay ( maff and law and also Lord Chancellor) said that any advocate who had done a course in Logic presented legal arguments which were turbo-charged ....
o whilst we are at it - back to corona - the figures from the first cohort of ventilated patients with corona = 50% died
BUT - the normal mortality of ventilation on ITU is 30% so it is not as gigantic as it first looked ( n = 150)
( Children under 16 - 15% normally - and I dont think more than 5 children hae been ventilated with this disease so the numbers are too small)
Lord McKay ( maff and law and also Lord Chancellor) said that any advocate who had done a course in Logic presented legal arguments which were turbo-charged ....
o whilst we are at it - back to corona - the figures from the first cohort of ventilated patients with corona = 50% died
BUT - the normal mortality of ventilation on ITU is 30% so it is not as gigantic as it first looked ( n = 150)
( Children under 16 - 15% normally - and I dont think more than 5 children hae been ventilated with this disease so the numbers are too small)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.