As I posted earlier there is w lot of guff talked about democrats and trade deals.
No doubt the new administration will prioritise improving links with the EU, and actually that is good news all round.
But the UK hosts the G7 and also the climate change talks, a subject Johnson is much closer to Democrat thinking on. Suspicion and anger over Brexit will fade
I don't see why it's wishful thinking to suggest that the UK and EU would be better-placed if there's at least some sort of trade deal in place post-Brexit.
I'd also like to point out that Johnson has three times set a deadline for talks to conclude, and three times that deadline has passed without talks actually finishing. Put bluntly, the only people who seriously want talks to end prematurely are those who won't have to bear any responsibility for the consequences.
The link is about someone speculating that the EU might think the PM is delaying a deal to see if Trump is re-elected.
And suggests that Johnson is hoping that happens.
That certainly WOULD be wishful thinking on a grand scale, but as I’ve already said I don’t believe it’s the case.
//I don't see why it's wishful thinking to suggest that the UK and EU would be better-placed if there's at least some sort of trade deal in place post-Brexit. //
But that isn't the crux of the wish here, is it. This is about waiting for the result of the US elections.
well - - you can attend to the wishful thinking of Naomi
or look at the facts
or both
Barnier is staying ( overnigh ) in London - and I suggest that is because a settlement is near
OK nearer
and a settlement is so much more sensible than a break
we will wonder why we forced / were forced to go to the wall....
ho hum - just a thought on a sunday afternoon
Gulliver, //When the U/K do eventually have to rejoin the the E/U//
Why do you think the UK will ‘have’ to rejoin the EU? Of the couple of hundred countries in the world only 27 are members of the EU. How do you think the rest manage without the dubious benefits of that motley organisation?