Quizzes & Puzzles10 mins ago
How Can Labour Recover?
I’ve just listened to a Labour spokeswoman (no idea who she was) saying that the way for Labour to recover is to return to the hard left. What is it they don’t understand?
If you were making decisions for Labour what changes would you implement to return them to a modicum of popularity?
If you were making decisions for Labour what changes would you implement to return them to a modicum of popularity?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I haven't "been shown" to be wrong... you've just blustered and insisted I am without actually justifying it.
If there's no difference between the two parties, then our votes make no meaningful difference either way... if our votes make no difference then we can't really call that democratic can we, because the people have no power.
If there's no difference between the two parties, then our votes make no meaningful difference either way... if our votes make no difference then we can't really call that democratic can we, because the people have no power.
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Guide d_democ racy?wp rov=sft i1
"Guided democracy, also called managed democracy, is a formally democratic government that functions as a de facto autocracy. Such governments are legitimized by elections that are free and fair, but do not change the state's policies, motives, and goals.
...
It is today widely employed in Russia, where it was introduced into common practice by Kremlin theorists, in particular Gleb Pavlovsky."
That's the system you are defending Zacs... and that is what the UK would be if the opposition did not actually stand for something other than the government.
"Guided democracy, also called managed democracy, is a formally democratic government that functions as a de facto autocracy. Such governments are legitimized by elections that are free and fair, but do not change the state's policies, motives, and goals.
...
It is today widely employed in Russia, where it was introduced into common practice by Kremlin theorists, in particular Gleb Pavlovsky."
That's the system you are defending Zacs... and that is what the UK would be if the opposition did not actually stand for something other than the government.
untitled: "If there's no difference between the two parties, then our votes make no meaningful difference either way... if our votes make no difference then we can't really call that democratic can we, because the people have no power." - you do not have to have two diametrically opposed parties to have a choice. As Noo Laybore demonstrated in 1997 when they gave us alternative Tories. The country is done with hard left type policies, now they want choices that are much more subtle. Often simply a change is desired as in 1997.
I don't personally agree that new labour were "tory lite", tora. I think they did offer a meaningful alternative to the tories - just not in the way "old labour" used to... their innovation was realising that there was more to disagree with the tories on than whether or not the gas board should be private.