Travel5 mins ago
Palace Racism
Ngozi Fulani was asked where she was originally from mmm, whats the problem there
it's not what or was considered a british christian name, i assume the palace get people from around the globe visiting, so why the big hoo haa.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-1 1486513 /Prince -Willia m-conde mns-una cceptab le-comm ents-go dmother -Lady-S usan-Hu ssey.ht ml
it's not what or was considered a british christian name, i assume the palace get people from around the globe visiting, so why the big hoo haa.
https:/
Answers
I think that the lady was asking where her family originated from. I think that is a genuine question, maybe not the time nor the place but it is hardly a major issue.
17:51 Wed 30th Nov 2022
The incident happened. The victim has every right not to bury it. It doesn't really matter if the victim underplays or overplays her reaction at this point, the main thing is that the incident happened and Lady Sarah Hussey resigned as a result of it, days ago.
It's kind of funny on here, watching people who will never let something go, insist that the victim should have just swallowed her tongue and moved on. Yeah, like they would have in her position ...
It's kind of funny on here, watching people who will never let something go, insist that the victim should have just swallowed her tongue and moved on. Yeah, like they would have in her position ...
I'm trying to.
It seems that you and I can agree that it's not Ngozi Fulani's fault that Lady Susan has resigned, if not whose fault it actually was.
So all these posts about Ngozi Fulani and her behaviour since the resignation are pointless, unless their point is to suggest that Ngozi Fulani should have kept her gob shut so that none of this ever happened, or maybe that she's a deserving victim.
It seems that you and I can agree that it's not Ngozi Fulani's fault that Lady Susan has resigned, if not whose fault it actually was.
So all these posts about Ngozi Fulani and her behaviour since the resignation are pointless, unless their point is to suggest that Ngozi Fulani should have kept her gob shut so that none of this ever happened, or maybe that she's a deserving victim.
Dressed as she was and having given her name (not her real one) surely the CW would expect some interest. As she is running a charity for abused women surely she is used to more robust questioning than that she received?
Personally having received her answers to my questions I would immediately have moved on and kept my thoughts and friendly curiosity to myself.
Personally having received her answers to my questions I would immediately have moved on and kept my thoughts and friendly curiosity to myself.
That's all a bit confusing, ellipsis. I don't actually know what you’re trying to say. It's a bit all over the place, but the bottom line is the precious lily-livered society that we inhabit is the product of people like Ngozi Fulani or whatever her real name is, who cry foul at every opportunity - so yes, she, as part of that society, is responsible. She claims to be working to educate in cultural sensibilities so one has to wonder why, when she met with someone who allegedly offended her sensibilities, she didn't take the opportunity.
erm sorrry she said she was abused
felt abused
same thing I reckon
, insist that the victim should have just swallowed her tongue and moved on.
I am abused everyday on AB - and I just grin and bear it ( with a smile and a spiteful one liner)
the tide I think is turing in the old leddy's favour. US tv the reaction seems to be - so what, other minorities in the Land of the Free get treated much worse on a daily basis
felt abused
same thing I reckon
, insist that the victim should have just swallowed her tongue and moved on.
I am abused everyday on AB - and I just grin and bear it ( with a smile and a spiteful one liner)
the tide I think is turing in the old leddy's favour. US tv the reaction seems to be - so what, other minorities in the Land of the Free get treated much worse on a daily basis
> She claims to be working to educate in cultural sensibilities so one has to wonder why, when she met with someone who allegedly offended her sensibilities, she didn't take the opportunity.
She did take the opportunity. She just didn't do it in a way that you approve of. She answered the questions she was being asked.
You are blaming Ngozi Fulani for the fact that Lady Susan resigned. Her fault, she didn't answer the questions in the right way. It's still a bit unclear how Fulani not answering the questions in the right way led to Lady Susan's resignation, but, basically what you're saying is that it was Fulani's fault.
She did take the opportunity. She just didn't do it in a way that you approve of. She answered the questions she was being asked.
You are blaming Ngozi Fulani for the fact that Lady Susan resigned. Her fault, she didn't answer the questions in the right way. It's still a bit unclear how Fulani not answering the questions in the right way led to Lady Susan's resignation, but, basically what you're saying is that it was Fulani's fault.
-- answer removed --