Fair play Addy (I had already looked), Juddlinkski is possibly a bit of a wind up merchant in that sense but maybe these are his actual views expressed here and that was just a silly question which I think was tongue in cheek from the start. Although as Hal points out, it detract a bit from those of us who were wavering more to Emma's way of thinking.
Anyway, I'm not defending or insulting Juddlinski... I'm merely saying that a question has been asked, a healthy debate ensued, (some I agreed with, some I didn't) and now it has desolved in to petty squabbling... What's the point?