Donate SIGN UP

Prince Harry

Avatar Image
fourteen85 | 06:49 Mon 01st May 2023 | Society & Culture
485 Answers
There has been talk in the press lately about him having lied on his visa form to gain entry to the USA, could he be stopped from re entering after the coronation?
Gravatar

Answers

141 to 160 of 485rss feed

First Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by fourteen85. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
But when they're under-age and trafficked by a previously convicted paedophile?
She wasn't underage - and 'trafficked' is debateable. She was offered a job as a travelling masseuse by Maxwell - and Epstein wasn't at that time a convicted paedophile.
//Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 by a Florida state court of procuring a child for prostitution //
Wow Naomi, you know everything!!
Epstein wasn't accused in 2008 of being a paedophile.
No spin. Look up paedophile. Andrew is guilty ... of being an idiot.
//Epstein wasn't accused in 2008 of being a paedophile//

Makes me wonder why he pleaded guilty in a Florida State Court.

Guess only the knowledgeable would know :-)
Wonder no longer. That wasn't the charge.
So Epstein wasn't a paedophile, he was a pimp?
Hmm, interesting spin, trying to protect a supposedly royal person.
No spin here... but you must be getting pretty dizzy.

Fact is Epstein was a dirty creep who Andrew should have avoided. He didn't ... which makes him an idiot. Idiocy, however, is not a criminal offence.
//Idiocy, however, is not a criminal offence.//
Maybe not, but his actions could be.
They're not. She was a willing partner and she wasn't underage. If only the man had told the truth .... fool that he is.
the condition being he wasn't guilty if in the UK. However if they had entwined in Florida or the US Virgin Islands before she was 18, that would have been an offence, each state setting their own 'age of consent'.
DTC. Its silly to say if it had happened elsewhere he would have been breaking the law. It didn't happen elsewhere and he wasn't breaking the law.
I agree as to not in the UK - but did he meet and physically engage with her chez Epstein in Florida.....?
sorry 'as to the UK' it should have read above.
No. They met up in London, New York, and on Epstein's private island in the Caribbean.
Jeffrey Epstein was no more a paedophile than Jimmy Savile ...

(neither convicted before death intervened)
I'm backing up Naomi on this. The fact is he has done nothing criminal He was just stupid and extremely stupid lying at that interview. He should just have admitted his stupidity.

141 to 160 of 485rss feed

First Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Prince Harry

Answer Question >>