ChatterBank4 mins ago
Stephen Fry Blasphemy Investigation
232 Answers
I thought this was a joke article from one of those spoof news sites when I first saw it. There are lots of questions here but I'll go with 'Does anyone think he'll actually be charged with the offence?'
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/201 7/05/06 /stephe n-fry-p olice-i nvestig ation-b lasphem y-brand ing-god -utter/
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ludwig. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.jackdaw - //a-h, confusion comes easily to you. I'm sure most others will get my drift. //
I have re-read your post, and I understand now what you meant.
Confusion comes easily to me in the same that lousy sentence construction comes to you - but I won't be rude about your shortcomings, if you are not rude about mine.
Deal?
I have re-read your post, and I understand now what you meant.
Confusion comes easily to me in the same that lousy sentence construction comes to you - but I won't be rude about your shortcomings, if you are not rude about mine.
Deal?
I agree with Fry's basic point here, which is (I think) that we can't possibly know whether a god exists or not. However, what we can know purely from observation of the facts is that IF he/she/it does exist, then he/she/or it is not a particularly good thing. It's at best inattentive, at worst malevolent.
It's a simple matter of logic. If people are offended by that it's their problem really. Don't shoot the messenger.
It's a simple matter of logic. If people are offended by that it's their problem really. Don't shoot the messenger.