Question Author
Kidas - I have just sat through a lecture by Jerry Coyne, evolutionist, introduced by Richard Dawkins. I guess his evolutionary credentials are well respected.
His lecture was full of flaws, from the old arguments about vestigial organs, poor design, the fossil record, and myths from embryology regurgitated.
Not at all convincing.
To believe him is to suspend an expectation of observational evidence that does not require FAITH to agree with his conclusions.
He often cites changes within a species, as evidence that the species is evolving into something else. All pure speculation and assumption. Yet this is the worldview that permeates our society, and woe to any scientist who challenges this so called evidence. Any who do would endanger their research funding, and even compromise their careers. It has happened many times before.
So no Kidas, I have to respectfully disagree with your assertion that there is loads of evidence for evolution.
Quite simply, there isn't.