Naomi - // ^That's an enormous generalisation and, as such, ill-considered. It may, as you say, apply to stupid people, but it assumes that only the stupid criticise the groups you mention and never with justification. That simply isn't so. //
It does indeed apply to stupid people, but it does not assume anything, certainly not that criticism is made without justification.
Homosexuals and Muslims, considered as social groups are not immune from criticism, because they are part of society, and no section of society is beyond cricitism.
My point is that people like Theland criticise them, not for valid reasons, but because he fears them for simply being what they are.
You might as well criticise someone for having blue eyes. It is not their choice per se, it is an aspect of who they are, but it does not define who they are to the point where they should be feared - that is simple ignorance, and that is the point I was making.
As for Theland's comparison of homosexualty to theft - again, you'd have to go a long way to find a comparison as fundamentally baseless and ignorant as that.
Theft is a conscious act with negative results for innocent victims.
To compare that with sexual orientation is to add crass ignorance to a list of unpleasant attitudes which Theland regularly displays on his hand-wringing pointless threads.