Donate SIGN UP

Secret Moderators

Avatar Image
ABSpareEditor | 15:23 Mon 26th Sep 2022 | Editor's Blog
467 Answers
I would like to acknowledge that there are some accounts that have been created by our moderators, to help them control the community, without breaking their normal identity.

Having multiple AnswerBank accounts is against site rules. However, these accounts have been approved by the Editors.

These moderators will be added to this thread, and you should give them as much respect as you would give to an Editor.

If you are a moderator, and would like to have one of these accounts, please send us an email.
Gravatar

Answers

161 to 180 of 467rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next Last

Avatar Image
Zacsmaster - It looks like I started all of this last night. In the past I removed posts and had to watch as a row breaks out about who was responsible and why. I can now use my usual name to remove the posts and explain why in my secretmod name. I will also be able to warn posters to kerb their tempers and it might result in less suspensions happening.
16:23 Mon 26th Sep 2022
SPUNGLE, "I mean, it's pretty obvious who 'Secretmod' is, isn't it??"

There were four known Mods, one of whom, DANNY, hasn't posted for months and the ED has said those four are not behind the two new names.
I think he was being ironic, TCL.
Top of my head I could name 7
Perhaps if the mods just did modding instead of prodding where it was necessary there wouldn't be the need for secrecy? It seems to me to be another layer of red tape and confusion. [Disclaimer. Please note this is an opinion, and should be regarded as such and not removed.]
If it was irony, it wasn't obvious to me.
TheCorbyLoon- It's blindingly obvious who SecretMod is. But obviously, it's not for me to say. If SecretMod wishes to remain secret, perhaps they should do their moderation in a different style to their usual non-secret posts. In that way, we could be less certain.
answerbank has always had sacred departments like body and soul as well as law and let us face it if khandro put a youtube video in body and soul then it would probably be removed because people want to hear from the one true messiah sqad i assume barmaid is the woman version of sqad but for law
Moderation shouldn’t be in a ‘style’, it should be purely factual. Suggesting, in secret mode that if people don’t see things in a certain way means that they’re ‘part of the problem’ is simply not on.
As I've said before, I am always amazed at how some folk can spot someone under a new name but perhaps I don't pay enough attention to the way folk post or what they post about.
Zacs.... If I was a secret mod I would be warning you. ;)
For what?
(I know you were joking)
Sheer insolence, Zacs, when you know secret Mods should be shown The Respect we all hold for The Editor, as specified by The Original Post Above by His/Her Secretish AB Spare Editor. Who is the Editor by the way, and do They ever put in an Appearance do They appear in the Council of Secret Mods behind closed doors?
Fair play to secret mod, when he (or she) gets their teeth into a thread they are very persistent.
This thread makes my head hurt.

Perhaps you should all put your pennies together and buy AB, run it as a business ...
They all seem to think they could, Wolfie…but I very much doubt it.
Gness, other forums have mods who have little signs saying that they are moderators. It works.

It is getting the balance between chatter and fact on non-CB posts that seems to be an issue. Johnny Cash had no place in that thread.

I admit to being guilty of using CB material outwith CB.

Anyway there are too many angry people. And people accusing others of misdeeds, esp multi user names, without proof.

Sleep well x
You’re right about angry people or is it some jumping in to have a go at another member rather than contributing to the OP.
That seems to happen far too often now. We seem to have lost many of the folk who could discuss rationally. Easy to see why we’ve lost them though. :-(
Sleep well you too. I should be in the land of nod now. My early shift in the charity shop. I’ll be dozing on the counter. :-)
gness, //They [ABers] all seem to think they could [run AB as a business], Wolfie…but I very much doubt it.//

Really? The current owners are asking for donations to prop the business up.

SecretMod, //People asking questions in the Law Section want to see answers from someone like Barmaid not a story from 60 years ago accompanied by a music video. If you can't see that then you are also part of the problem.//

I can hardly believe I'm reading that. Gobsmacked! Is that your advice on how to encourage people to use AB? No rules broken but unless you can offer a level of expertise in a specific area don’t respond? I fear, my dear, that your version of moderation - and admin's apparent support of it - isn't 'part of the problem' - it is the problem - and if the powers that be, after years of being told the same thing, still can't see that, it is, sadly for their business, their problem.

161 to 180 of 467rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Secret Moderators

Answer Question >>