Absolutely not - although carried out for the same reasons - culture. Interestingly, one mother defended her decision to have her baby's ears peireced by saying they were both done at the same time - ' ..so less pain'. Actually, no, it's double the pain if you think about it - and why would you cause your baby ANY pain, never mind trying to minimise it by doing the...
Could I slightly bypass the original question so as to take the opportunity of asking any of our female ABers who might have had the following piercings such as Eyebrow, Lip and Tongue, why they chose to have them done?
To compare with FGM was presumably just for the inflammatory effect to stir up the posters? You cannot have meant it seriously? Me? I think babies and toddlers with pierced ears are the mark of the (very) common poeple. When I was a child only gypsies did it.
I squeaked at a neighbours child 16 - you've got a tattoo ! That has been against the law for fifty years
and he said - no it is a henna tattoo which washes off
// Could I slightly bypass the original question so as to take the opportunity of asking any of our female ABers who might have had the following piercings such as Eyebrow, Lip and Tongue, why they chose to have them done? //
o come on AOG tell us where you Prince Albert is !
and recollect that Prince Albert Victor ( the one what died ) and Prince George ( the one what didnt ) had his and his tattoos when on board HMS someone in the nineties ( 1890s that is ). It is not known what their grandmother ( QV) said
AOG - //I am not interested in Male adornments, but I cannot understand why sometime a pretty female chooses to disfigure herself with such facial adornments. //
I agree - I do like attractive tattoos on women, but I have never felt any woman's face is enhanced by the addition of metalwork - but of course, each to their own.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.