ChatterBank0 min ago
Should Notting Hill Carnival Police Face Dance Ban?
198 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Danny, AH said this was a breach of his own ‘so’ rule. You see how the response doesn’t address the original statement but conveys something different entirely.
/// 12.50 well its you who seem to think they [the police] have stopped working, because of the odd jig just to please the crowd. Its you that's silly ///
So it would be quite in order for an airline pilot to leave the cockpit so as to have a jig with one of the female flight attendants, just to please the passengers you understand?
I'll say no more. If you want clarification ask him.
/// 12.50 well its you who seem to think they [the police] have stopped working, because of the odd jig just to please the crowd. Its you that's silly ///
So it would be quite in order for an airline pilot to leave the cockpit so as to have a jig with one of the female flight attendants, just to please the passengers you understand?
I'll say no more. If you want clarification ask him.
Yes Danny, the so rule isn't about superfluous posting, but irrational following of it.
You must have seen some posters, where if you say "I don't really like red", they reply with "oh. So you are saying everyone wearing red should be shot then?"....or some such rubbish. Non-sequiturs always seem to follow a "so". I noticed it on here long before Andy named it as a 'rule'.
You must have seen some posters, where if you say "I don't really like red", they reply with "oh. So you are saying everyone wearing red should be shot then?"....or some such rubbish. Non-sequiturs always seem to follow a "so". I noticed it on here long before Andy named it as a 'rule'.
Naomi is quite correct, the 'So Rule' has nothing to do with the relatively recent irritant of starting a sentence with the word 'So ...'.
It is pointing out that people who often say something completely different, and often the opposite of the post they are replying to, start their post with the word 'So ….'.
The full phrase is usually 'So what you are saying is ...' followed by something the original poster is not saying at all.
In this instance, AOG started his post about pilots dancing in the aisles with word 'So ...' and I pointed it out.
It's simply something for my amusement, feel free to ignore it if you don't like it, but remember, if people don't do it, I won't point it out!
It is pointing out that people who often say something completely different, and often the opposite of the post they are replying to, start their post with the word 'So ….'.
The full phrase is usually 'So what you are saying is ...' followed by something the original poster is not saying at all.
In this instance, AOG started his post about pilots dancing in the aisles with word 'So ...' and I pointed it out.
It's simply something for my amusement, feel free to ignore it if you don't like it, but remember, if people don't do it, I won't point it out!
Sqad - // What next, the corporal slapping the brigadier on the shoulder and saying "welcome to the barracks sir" //
No, because that would be disrespectful to an officer of a senior rank. The equivalent would be a constable slapping a sergent on the shoulder and saying "Welcome to the carnival Sarge … ".
But disrespect to senior ranks is not what we are discussing, so that has nothing at all to do with the debate. It concerns police offers showing a little humour and spirit of the occasion, and whether or not that is wrong, and they should be prevented from doing do.
No, because that would be disrespectful to an officer of a senior rank. The equivalent would be a constable slapping a sergent on the shoulder and saying "Welcome to the carnival Sarge … ".
But disrespect to senior ranks is not what we are discussing, so that has nothing at all to do with the debate. It concerns police offers showing a little humour and spirit of the occasion, and whether or not that is wrong, and they should be prevented from doing do.
Sqad - // A-H...I disagree, my simile may not be the best, but my point is that it shows disrespect........to authority. //
In your scenario, an officer is directly and identifiably disrespectful to a senior officer - I fail to see how that fits with a police officer doing a little jig for a few minutes at a carnival.
If you are thinking that this means that the officer loses the respect of the public, then I disagree, but once again, your army scenario fails to fit again.
In your scenario, an officer is directly and identifiably disrespectful to a senior officer - I fail to see how that fits with a police officer doing a little jig for a few minutes at a carnival.
If you are thinking that this means that the officer loses the respect of the public, then I disagree, but once again, your army scenario fails to fit again.
Dance? Plod should actively join in, especially the "parade". Why don't they get a plod squad car done up with wobbly wheels and the blues and twos flashing the "rainbow" lights whilst the pa system blasts out its good to be gay. Clouds of smoke could be arranged to pour out of the exhaust whilst the 23 occupants in oversized "uniforms" complete with red nose attachments and nail varnish and the occasional tattoos hang out of the windows gurning maniacally. Then at the end of the parade a pretend bomber could sneak up and blow all the doors and the bonnet off whilst they tumble about tasering each other blaming each other for making them look stupid. The crowd would all be nodding gravely and whispering reeespect maaan. Plod could then erect a police do not cross barrier with balloons as well as tape and toke up and get rat arrised like everyone else.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.