Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Brexit - What If?
The PM swallows his pride, sends the extension request to Brussels and it's refused (as one French minister has opined). What then?
Answers
Whether or not there is any extension / unity government or whatever if any deal that is acceptable to the EU cannot get approval in Parliament & MPs in their wisdom will not countenance a no-deal then the only alternative is to scrap Brexit & remain in the EU. Just revoke A50 and avoid any further messing about with a "People's Vote" or whatever. In that case the...
09:44 Sat 07th Sep 2019
//Boris' hands look to be tied a little tighter.//
Not really. There is no need for them to threaten court action. The Prime Minister has no option but to comply with the law, however much it irks him. As much as I want to see a swift and proper Brexit, if politicians begin to pick and choose which laws they will comply with and which they won't we're at the top of a very slippery slope. It's ludicrous to suggest he will not comply.
Not really. There is no need for them to threaten court action. The Prime Minister has no option but to comply with the law, however much it irks him. As much as I want to see a swift and proper Brexit, if politicians begin to pick and choose which laws they will comply with and which they won't we're at the top of a very slippery slope. It's ludicrous to suggest he will not comply.
:-) wishful thinking.
Any new deal based on May's/the EU's pile of guano isn't going to be Brexit. If remoaner MPs are just using this all as an excuse to stop Brexit it's unlikely to be sufficiently remain for them, and certainly insufficient for anyone wanting us to leave. So maybe the only damage is what affect more uncertainty and delay causes. During which time we may get a GE.
We can wait, but it's well beyond a joke already.
Any new deal based on May's/the EU's pile of guano isn't going to be Brexit. If remoaner MPs are just using this all as an excuse to stop Brexit it's unlikely to be sufficiently remain for them, and certainly insufficient for anyone wanting us to leave. So maybe the only damage is what affect more uncertainty and delay causes. During which time we may get a GE.
We can wait, but it's well beyond a joke already.
Politicians don't normally feel a need to pick and choose which laws to comply with. They just change existing or introduce new as suits. Needs must when the devil drives and all that. But practically speaking, I suspect Johnson would need to resign as party leader to avoid having to ask for more misery for the nation.
-- answer removed --
No ideas if this is right or if this link will work.
https:/ /twitte r.com/L utherB0 2307466 /status /117003 4420834 873345? s=09
https:/
The link is fine Webbo, and the point set in stone. I was reading it earlier and just lay low and kept my powder dry. If the remainiacs get a sniff of it they will launch another kamikaze attack. The first letter in the link is quite succinct, but other comments are reassuring as well.
https:/ /indepe ndenced aily.co .uk/let ters-to -the-ed itor-sa turday- 7th-sep tember- 2017/?u tm_sour ce=mail poet&am p;utm_m edium=e mail&am p;utm_c ampaign =INDEPE NDENCE+ Daily+N ewslett er1
https:/
Not that I know much about this sort of chicanery but what sort of kamikaze attack could be launched ? Either we are already out, or it needs the Queen's "ok" based on the PM's advice. As long as BJ knows he has the option not to give the advice it doesn't get to be law. So no extension. Mind you the workings of politics defy all reason it seems. Perhaps it doesn't count if the month starts with an "S".