jim - // // ... it somehow has more weight and validity than from a scientist who disagrees with her ... //
Again, a weird refusal to address the flaw in your argument, namely that most, and indeed nearly all, reputable scientists largely agree with her. Climate Change is a real and present threat, and your weird insistence that it is, at best even money as to whether that's true undermines the credibility of your dismissal of Thunberg. //
I think it is the flaw in your argument that you fail to grasp - that if a crinkly scientist says something in agreement with Ms T, it is largely ignored, but because she says it, as she has been told to do, it suddenly takes on the significance of the original text of the bible.
It's not her argument I am at issue with, it is the manipulation of her as a vulnerable child to push the views of her parents that I find repugnant.