ChatterBank1 min ago
Spanking Your Children
334 Answers
For, against, or it's no one elses business what you do behind closed doors?
https:/ /global news.ca /news/5 096786/ banning -spanki ng-chil dren/
I don't see the issue with striking the bottom of your own infant. There is a difference between spanking a child, and then child abuse.
https:/
I don't see the issue with striking the bottom of your own infant. There is a difference between spanking a child, and then child abuse.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by spathiphyllum. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.You’re just getting odder and odder - the whole notion of hitting a child that you love and would do anything for is already bad enough (because they’ve done something you don’t approve of - maybe should have brought them up better then) but the 1940’s, getting the kid to bend over your knee to be spanked is just bizarre.
-- answer removed --
It seems people are split on weather or not spanking is acceptable. Some consider it abuse, others see that sometimes there seems no easier or better way to quickly resolve a spiralling situation
In conclusion (in my opinion) it should not be banned. Child abuse is already illegal, so if spanking your child turns into abuse then there is already a crime for that. However i think the very occasional moment where the child plays up to the point of getting a spank on the bottom is fine, anything more is OTT. Especially actions such as the one Tinks has very kindly provided when she didn't have to.
In conclusion (in my opinion) it should not be banned. Child abuse is already illegal, so if spanking your child turns into abuse then there is already a crime for that. However i think the very occasional moment where the child plays up to the point of getting a spank on the bottom is fine, anything more is OTT. Especially actions such as the one Tinks has very kindly provided when she didn't have to.
"The child can either, take away the lesson that doing wrong will result in being punished, or they will take away the lesson they can hit things. I personally think the first lesson (doing wrong, or what mummy doesn't want you to do) will result in a spanked bottom will overlook the second, because a kid knows he's not allowed to hit other kids, so in doing so, he will be punished by a spank from mummy."
so its ok for adults to punish by hitting but its not ok for kids to punish by hitting?
so its ok for adults to punish by hitting but its not ok for kids to punish by hitting?
correct just like it's OK for an adult to have a beer but it's not OK for a kid to have a beer. It's OK for an adult to teach their own child a lesson with slight physical action and it is not OK for a kid to feel they can then use that same principle.
If we get into the realms of what can adults do and kids can't then there will be many, very good examples to why adults can do more things than a child.
If we get into the realms of what can adults do and kids can't then there will be many, very good examples to why adults can do more things than a child.
I thought it was right for my children and the situation that merited a smack on the leg or bottom at the time. I'm not saying it's right for other people to follow, nowt to do with me how they bring up their children.
I am however genuinely curious how others who dont/ didnt smack their pre school children disciplined their offspring?
I am however genuinely curious how others who dont/ didnt smack their pre school children disciplined their offspring?