News9 mins ago
Signs Of Much Greater Importance
305 Answers
When Jesus Christ was on earth, he gave his listeners a lesson in observing signs and acting accordingly. He was talking about something of far-reaching importance. The Bible reports: “The Pharisees and Sadducees approached him and, to tempt him, they asked him to display to them a sign from heaven. In reply he said to them: ‘When evening falls you are accustomed to say, “It will be fair weather, for the sky is fire-red”; and at morning, “It will be wintry, rainy weather today, for the sky is fire-red, but gloomy-looking.” You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but the signs of the times you cannot interpret.’”—Matthew 16:1-3
.Rve 1:1
Rev 6:1-9
.Rve 1:1
Rev 6:1-9
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by goodlife. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.pixie, would you like to enrol?
https:/ /www.uc l.ac.uk /philos ophy/cu rrent-s tudents /ba-pro grammes /ba-mod ules
https:/
Khandro, is this the church in Iceland that was used in the film?
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Hallg r%C3%AD mskirkj a
If so, it is one of the most stunning churches I have ever seen anywhere in the world. The interior is simplicity itself. Absolutely beautiful.
Iceland is predominately Lutherian.
I didn’t say the time I spent listening to Melanie Phillips was wasted. I watched the whole video. I just wonder why you asked me, in particular, to watch it.
https:/
If so, it is one of the most stunning churches I have ever seen anywhere in the world. The interior is simplicity itself. Absolutely beautiful.
Iceland is predominately Lutherian.
I didn’t say the time I spent listening to Melanie Phillips was wasted. I watched the whole video. I just wonder why you asked me, in particular, to watch it.
n. I don't think that was it, but agree it looks spectacular.
Though it wasn't the church that intrigued me it was the talk of 'confession' which I thought was only within the RC tradition.
But after all it was only a movie, so the church, of which only the interior could be seen, could have been anywhere & the scriptwriter could have taken liberties with the dialogue.
(btw, apart from the sermon there was a punch-up included in there! )
Though it wasn't the church that intrigued me it was the talk of 'confession' which I thought was only within the RC tradition.
But after all it was only a movie, so the church, of which only the interior could be seen, could have been anywhere & the scriptwriter could have taken liberties with the dialogue.
(btw, apart from the sermon there was a punch-up included in there! )
Nailit - there are problems that in my own time and for my own satisfaction I will research.
But you ignore the mass of evidence for prophecy.
Time after time the Israelites were warned what would happen if they turned their back on
God.
Exile, death, persecution, no peace wherever they tried to settle, their name becoming a byword, antiSemitism which prevails to this day.
But the people regathered to the land under the protection of God.
It all is written in the bible, what happened is written in the history books, and is still happening today if you read / watch the news.
So what do you think if that?
But you ignore the mass of evidence for prophecy.
Time after time the Israelites were warned what would happen if they turned their back on
God.
Exile, death, persecution, no peace wherever they tried to settle, their name becoming a byword, antiSemitism which prevails to this day.
But the people regathered to the land under the protection of God.
It all is written in the bible, what happened is written in the history books, and is still happening today if you read / watch the news.
So what do you think if that?
Pixie - "Everything that says otherwise."
Eh? what? Darwinism? Not proven.
Evolution, not proven. A universe from nothing, not,proven, abiogenesis not proven.
Masses of prophecy in the bible proven.
Objective morality from the bible, versus relativism and subjective feelings, disaster.
Dawkins does not believe in good or evil. Says we simply dance to our DNA.
Do you recognise evil? I do.
Eh? what? Darwinism? Not proven.
Evolution, not proven. A universe from nothing, not,proven, abiogenesis not proven.
Masses of prophecy in the bible proven.
Objective morality from the bible, versus relativism and subjective feelings, disaster.
Dawkins does not believe in good or evil. Says we simply dance to our DNA.
Do you recognise evil? I do.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.